Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Welker vs Sabine Rutlauka Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Welker vs Rutlauka analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Welker vs Sabine Rutlauka Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Welker 1 - 0 Rutlauka
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Welker has won 38.86% of points on their second serve, while Rutlauka has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Welker, in recent form, has won 56.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rutlauka has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.73% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Welker has saved 42.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rutlauka has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Welker has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 24/ 18), with Rutlauka winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 43/ 42). Rutlauka has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 25/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Welker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 18/ 10), where as Rutlauka has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Welker winning 1 times and Rutlauka being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Welker winning 2 and Rutlauka winning 0. The last match between Welker and Rutlauka was at the W15 Sharm El Sheikh, 22-03-2021, Q2 round, Hard with Emily Welker getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Welker and Rutlauka have played a deciding set 0 times, with Welker winning 0 times and Rutlauka 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Welker winning 0, and Rutlauka 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Welker has played against opponents with an average rank of 186.07 while Rutlauka has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Welker has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rutlauka has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Welker has converted 48.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rutlauka has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
832
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
885
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
54% (116-97)
Career Total W/L
67% (33-16)
56% (5-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emily Welker | Sabine Rutlauka |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Welker | Sabine Rutlauka |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (103/101) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 20 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:13 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 223.44 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (498/673) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 53% (262/498) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (68/175) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (53/109) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (344/698) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Eva Maria Ionescu
Player
Emily Welker
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Eva Maria Ionescu
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Nikol Rivkin
77%
(
72 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Emily Welker
79%
(
92 of
116)
1st Serve %
85%
(
107 of
126)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
10 of
24)
Break Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
58 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
68 of
126)
126
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Emily Welker
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Emily Welker
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
3
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
58 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sabine Rutlauka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Laia Conde Monfort
Player
Sabine Rutlauka
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucia Cortez Llorca
Player
Sabine Rutlauka
44%
(
32 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
3
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
11
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sabine Rutlauka
Player
Mariana Borges
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Sabine Rutlauka
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
27%
(
7 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 5-7 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 2-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dea Herdzelas
Player
Sabine Rutlauka
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Welker Vs Rutlauka Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
